
|

|
|


|

|

|

|

|
|
Los Angeles Employment Discrimination Lawyer
"Some employers use factors such as age, race, gender, disability status and religious beliefs to discriminate against their employees. As an employment lawyer who only represents employees, it is my job to ensure that when they engage in this conduct, they don’t get away with it."
--- James W. Johnston, Esq.
|
Unlawful Discrimination - Statutory Grounds
It is unlawful for an employer to wrongfully termination,
discriminate or harass an employee
because of that employee's race, sex, color, national origin, religion,
ancestry, pregnancy, physical or mental disability, marital status, medical condition, age, or
sexual orientation. (There are also other types of unlawful
discrimination discussed elsewhere on this site.) An experienced
employment discrimination lawyer can evaluate whether you have a
case. |
|
Enforcement in California
In California, most cases of unlawful discrimination by an employer are
pursued under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act
(FEHA), rather than federal law, Title VII. That is the case because in most instances FEHA provides greater remedies and
more protection to an employee who has been victimized by this type of conduct than does
federal law.
Even At-Will Employee Protected
Even
"at-will" employees are entitled to the legal protections afforded by
FEHA and Title VII, and can sue an employer
who has engaged in this type of discrimination. Additionally, discrimination based
on a woman's pregnancy, child birth, or other related medical conditions, may constitute a
form of sex discrimination.
25 Years Experience
Mr. Johnston has been a lawyer for more than 25 years. If you believe you have been harassed or discriminated against on the basis of Age,
Ancestry, Color, Religious Creed, Denial of Family and Medical Care Leave,
Disability, Marital Status, Medical
Condition , National Origin, Race, Religion,
Sex, and Sexual Orientation, and would like to consult with an employment lawyer
in Los Angeles, we invite
you to contact our office and make an appointment to speak with attorney
Johnston about your case.
|
|
Want to Find Out Right Away if You Have a Valid
Case for Employment Discrimination?
Click
Here
|
|
|
|
|
Ask
an Employment Discrimination Lawyer
If you believe you have been the victim of employment discrimination in
your workplace, we invite you to contact attorney Johnston about your
potential claim(s) by clicking on the link in the box
at left.
|

Employment Discrimination Links
Employment Discrimination Page - U.S. Department of Justice
EEOC - Discrimination in
Employment
California Department of Fair Employment
and Housing
Employment
Discrimination Overview - Cornell University Law School
Employment Discrimination - Wikipedia
|
|
Loading the player ...
|
|
Our Firm and
Clients
In the News
|
|
|
Employment Law National Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlawful Discrimination - Conduct
Prohibited
The following conduct is unlawful if based on one of the listed statutory
grounds for unlawful discrimination (listed above):
- Failing or refusing to hire
- Failing or refusing to refer for employment
- Discharging
- Failing to promote
- Demoting
- Otherwise discriminating with respect to compensation, terms,
conditions, or privileges of employment.
Additional Conduct Prohibited
Proving Discrimination
The burden is on the employee to show that he or she suffered an adverse
employment action because of unlawful discrimination by the employer. This
burden may be sustained by proving that the adverse action was the result of
disparate treatment, disparate impact, or a failure to accommodate where there
is a duty to do so, if such conduct is based on one of the enumerated grounds
for unlawful discrimination.
|
|
|
Selected Employment Discrimination
Cases
Mathieu v. Norrell
Corp. (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 1174;
Second District Court of Appeals, Division Seven. In a
joint-employer case
brought under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the court held that where an employer sends an
employee to do work for another person, and both have the right to
exercise certain powers of control over the employee, that
employee may be held to have two employers - his original or
"general" employer and a second, "special"
employer."
Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 359;
Fifth District Court of Appeals. In the case, the employee
filed suit against her employer, alleging a violation of FEHA.
One of the issues presented in the case, was what constituted an
"adverse employment action." The court concluded
that to be actionable, the adverse treatment must be reasonably
likely to impair a reasonable employee's job performance or
prospects for advancement, as distinguished from minor or
relatively trivial actions that are likely to do no more than
displease.
Campbell v. Arco Marine, Inc. (1996)
42 Cal.App.4th 1850; Second District Court of Appeals, Division
Four. The appeals court held that FEHA does not apply to
nonresidents when the wrongful conduct occurred outside
California, even if the employer is based in California.
Sample Superior Court Discrimination Complaint
(Los Angeles County)

|
|
The above information is provided as a courtesy of The
Johnston Law Firm, and constitutes only a brief summary of some general
employment law, discrimination issues and related legal rights under California law.
As such
it does not constitute legal advice, and you should contact an attorney to
discuss any specific employment issue you may have. For further questions,
please contact our office on the forms provided.
333 S. Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 291-6977
Site
Map | Home | Wrongful
Termination | Disability Discrimination | Employment Discrimination | FEHA | FMLA
| Pregnancy Discrimination | Overtime
Pay | Meal & Rest Breaks | Retaliatory Termination
| Union Employee Lawyer | Public
Employee Lawyer |
Sexual Harassment | Title
VII | USERRA | Attorney
Links | Legal Resources | FAQS | Site Search
|
|
|

|
|